We attack production systems the way an adversary would, from applications and infrastructure to models and agents, then fix what breaks. Start with a secure design review, a scoped adversarial test, or a chaos drill.
We probe models, agents, pipelines, applications and binaries for the failures that evals and standard pentests miss.
Then harden the system.
The team that found the problem helps fix it, then retests the agreed changes against the original attack.
What actually breaks.
Evals test what a model says. Pentests test the application around it. Three of the five classes below sit between the two: what the model can be talked into, and what the agent is then allowed to do.
Findings on the map5 classes
LLM01HighPrompt injection past your filters+
Instructions arrive inside content you already trust: a document, a page, a tool result.
Atlas surfaces: User, LLM
AG1HighAgents steered into unsafe tool use+
A persuaded model uses the real credentials it already holds.
Atlas surfaces: Agent, Tool
AG2HighAuthority boundaries that leak+
One component acts with the privileges of another, and nothing in the flow says no.
Atlas surfaces: Identity, MCP server
SC1MediumModel and weight provenance+
Weights, adapters, and datasets arrive with no chain of custody you can prove.
Atlas surfaces: Data path
RE1MediumRisk that sits past source+
Firmware and binaries ship behavior that no source review sees.
Atlas surfaces: Native binary
The full catalog of classes we test for is the threat register.
One team, from test to fix.
Adversarial testing, secure design review and chaos engineering, run by the team that then fixes what they find.
We attack applications, APIs, infrastructure, models and agents the way an adversary would, including the permission and integration failures that standard testing misses.
Surfaces this offer acts on:UserLLMAgentIdentityToolMCP serverNative binaryData path
The retainer after a first engagement: closed paths re-checked every month as the system changes.
Surfaces this offer acts on:AgentIdentityToolMCP serverNative binaryData path
Every engagement leaves you the Atlas map of the system in scope.
The team that built a system is the wrong team to prove it safe. That takes an outside adversary accountable for the result.
What an engagement looks like.
Most first engagements are a scoped adversarial test, or a secure design review.
Coverage over time4 steps
01
Scope
The surface, the rules of engagement, test windows, and data handling are agreed in writing before anything is touched.
Atlas at this step, 6 of 8 surfaces mapped
02
Attack
Senior operators attack the agreed targets. Every high-impact step passes a human gate.
Atlas at this step, 6 of 8 surfaces tested
03
Harden and retest
Findings become changes your engineers can ship. We retest agreed fixes against the original attack and record what is closed, still open, or accepted.
Atlas at this step, 6 of 8 surfaces retested
04
Retainer
Optional. Continuous Assurance re-checks closed findings every month and keeps the Atlas map current.
Atlas at this step, 4 of 8 surfaces retested
Outside this example's agreed scope. The steps map and test six surfaces.
What you receive.
A scoped adversarial test produces four artifacts, all yours to keep; a secure design review produces the report, the summary and the map. The Atlas map is machine-readable. Engagement options and how we quote are on Services; coverage, severity and the six phases are on the method page.
The deliverable4 artifacts
01Findings report
Every finding with the path it took, its rating, the steps to reproduce it, and the change that closes it.
02Executive summary
What was tested, what held, and what to fix first, written for the person who approves the fix.
03Evidence bundle
The record behind each finding, pinned to the run that produced it, so your team can replay it without us.
04Atlas map
The machine-readable map of every surface in scope. You keep it, and the next engagement starts from it.
Before you ask.
Common questions3 questions
What are the rules of engagement?+
Staging before production. Seven named stop conditions that halt testing without waiting for confirmation. Short-lived, least-privilege credentials you can revoke at any moment.
How fast can you start?+
A call is the first step. An adversarial test starts once its scope, rules of engagement and test windows are agreed in writing.
Do you need our source?+
It helps, but it is not required. Where there is no source, we reverse-engineer the binary in the same engagement.
Test what you are building, before someone else does.